Appeal No. 1999-2797
Application No. 08/609,875
however, does not overcome the innate deficiencies of Posso and
Kuga discussed supra and, therefore, we do not sustain the
obviousness rejection of dependent claims 6, 7, 9, and 10.
In conclusion we have not sustained the Examiner’s
obviousness rejection of any of the claims on appeal. Therefore,
the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-7, 9, and 10 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
jfr/vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007