MATSUSHIMA et al. V. ASCHAUER et al. - Page 2




                Interference No. 104,354                                                                  Paper No. 60                   
                Matsushima v. Aschauer                                                                           Page 2                  
                No. 58).  Matsushima's counsel confirmed in a telephone call with a Trial Section paralegal that it will                 

                no longer pursue the inequitable conduct issue.                                                                          

                                                               ORDER                                                                     

                        Upon consideration of Aschauer's request for adverse judgment, it is—                                            

                        ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is awarded against senior party Aschauer;                        

                        FURTHER ORDERED that Aschauer is not entitled to a patent containing Aschauer                                    

                08/466,546 patent application claims 42, 60, 62, 64, and 68-74, which correspond to Count 1;                             

                        FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us, junior party Matsushima is entitled                         

                to a patent containing Matsushima 5,652,338 patent claim 1, which corresponds to Count 1; and                            






























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007