The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 26 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Filed: August 6, 2001 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ GIORGIO PAGANI and UMBERTO ZARDI Junior Party (Application 08/860,960), v. CARLO RESCALLI Senior Party, (Patent 5,886,222 and Patent 5,763,660). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,556 _______________ Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT (Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a)) Senior Party Rescalli has requested adverse judgement. (Paper No. 25). Upon consideration of the record, it is: ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper No. 1, page 6), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against Senior Party Rescalli. FURTHER ORDERED that Senior Party Rescalli is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-3 of Rescalli U.S. Patent 5,886,222 and claims 1-18 of Rescalli, U.S. Patent 5,763,660.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007