CLOUGH et al. V. BRAND et al. V. CLOUGH et al. - Page 2




                                                        JUDGMENT                                                                
                      Whereas the junior party, Clough et al., has failed to file a response to the Order to                    
               Show Cause of December 20, 2000 (Paper No. 26) within the time set therefor, pursuant to                         
               that Order judgment is hereby entered as follows:                                                                
                                                        JUDGMENT                                                                
                      Judgment as to the subject matter of the sole count in issue is hereby awarded to                         
               Brand et al., the senior party.                                                                                  
                      Accordingly, Clough et al. (Patent 5,342,837) are not entitled to their patent claims 1-10                
               corresponding to the count and, also, are not entitled to claims 1, 6, 7, 9 and 11-15 of their                   
               application 08/282,392 which correspond to the count.                                                            
                      On the record before us, Brand et al. are entitled to a patent containing their  claims 9                 
               and 13-26 corresponding to the count.                                                                            




                                     ______________________________)                                                            
                                                                           )                                                    
                                     Administrative Patent Judge           )                                                    
                                                                           )                                                    
                                                                           )                                                    
               ______________________________) BOARD OF PATENT                                                                  
                                                                  ) APPEALS AND                                                
                                     Administrative Patent Judge           )  INTERFERENCES                                     
                                                                           )                                                    
                                                                           )                                                    
                                     ______________________________)                                                            
                                                                           )                                                    
                                     Administrative Patent Judge           )                                                    








                                                             - 2 -                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007