THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 46 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ ROGER K. MAES and STEPHEN J. SPATZ1 Junior Party, v. PAULUS J. A. SONDERMEIJER and MARTHA J. WILLEMSE2 Senior Party ____________ Patent Interference No. 104,074 ___________________ Before CAROFF, HANLON and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.138, Maes et al., the junior party, has expressly abandoned application 08/430,112 (see paper no. 45). This is being treated as a request for entry of an adverse judgment against Maes et al. as to all claims 1 Application 08/430,122, filed April 24, 1995. 2 Application 08/504,617, filed July 20, 1995. Assignors to Akzo Nobel N.V..Page: 1 2 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007