The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 46 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Filed: November 20, 2001 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ JOHN J. MEFFORD and JOHN B. HOMOELLE Junior Party (Patent 5,446,493) v. MARK L. JARAND Senior Party (Application 08/726,651). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,384 _______________ Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIAM. JUDGMENT (Concession of Priority Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.656(i)) Junior Party Mefford’s principal brief on the issue of priority and/or derivation was due August 13, 2001. To date, Junior Party Mefford has not filed a principal brief. As set forth in 37 CFR § 1.656(i), when a junior party fails to timely file an opening brief, the Board may issue an order to show cause why junior party’s failure to file a brief should not be treated as a concession of priority.Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007