THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 44 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ DALE SUNDBY Junior Party (Patent 08/819,190), v. DAVID W. ROTH and DYLAN SALISBURY Senior Party (Application 08/787,979). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,443 _______________ Before LEE, GARDNER-LANE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 On January 17, 2001, junior party Sundby was ordered to show cause why adverse judgment as to the subject matter of the count should not be entered against Sundby. (Paper 43). Junior party had 20 days from January 17, 2001 to respond to the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Junior party Sundby has not responded. During aPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007