The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 26
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: August 6, 2001
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
GIORGIO PAGANI and UMBERTO ZARDI
Junior Party
(Application 08/860,960),
v.
CARLO RESCALLI
Senior Party,
(Patent 5,886,222 and Patent 5,763,660).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,556
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT
(Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a))
Senior Party Rescalli has requested adverse judgement. (Paper No. 25). Upon consideration
of the record, it is:
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper
No. 1, page 6), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against Senior Party Rescalli.
FURTHER ORDERED that Senior Party Rescalli is not entitled to a patent containing claims
1-3 of Rescalli U.S. Patent 5,886,222 and claims 1-18 of Rescalli, U.S. Patent 5,763,660.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007