The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 66 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Filed: October 25, 2001 Washington, DC 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ THORSTEN FROST, HEINZ SCHILDE, and MANFRED JANSEN, Junior Party, (Patent 5,932,329) v. F. EUGENE WOODARD and LOUIS C. LAU, Senior Party, (Application 09/029,039) ________________ Patent Interference 104,595 ________________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SPIEGEL and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL JUDGMENT Junior party Frost was ordered to show cause by October 17, 2001 why judgment should not be entered against it pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.640(d)(3) and (e) (Paper 65). Junior party Frost did not filed a response. Therefore, on this record, it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007