The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 31 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 26 April 2001 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ HIDESHI UCHINO, JUNE ENDO, TOSHIHIKO SUGANO, TOMOHIKO TAKAHAMA, TAKU KATO, EIJI TANIYAMA and NAOSHI IWAMA, Junior Party, (Patent 5,594,081), v. LUIGI RESCONI, ILYA E. NIFANT’EV, YURI A. DUBITSKY, ELISABETTA BARBASSA, COLIN J. SCHAVERIEN and RENE ERNST, Senior Party, (Application 08/655,729). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,641 _______________ Before: SCHAFER, MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Resconi has filed a paper requesting and agreeing to entry of an adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662. Paper 29. Accordingly, it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007