KANNO v. FLYNN et al - Page 1




                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being                                            
                                              entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                                            Paper 16                                                     
                Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                        
                       Box Interference                                                        Filed: 15 March 2001                     
                Washington, D.C.  20231                                                                                                  
                Tel:  703-308-9797                                                                                                       
                Fax:  703-305-0942                                                                                                       
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                                          HIROSHI KANNO                                                                  
                                                             Junior Party,                                                               
                                                          (Patent 5,998,005),                                                            
                                                                   v.                                                                    
                                    PAUL MARY FLYNN, RICHARD LEON McCONNELL,                                                             
                                     HUBERTUS JACOBUS WILHELMUS MOOLENAAR                                                                
                                               and TIMOTHY MICHAEL SANDERS                                                               
                                                             Senior Party                                                                
                                                      (Application 09/576,425).                                                          
                                                          _______________                                                                
                                                   Patent Interference No. 104,663                                                       
                                                          _______________                                                                
                         Before: SCHAFER, LEE and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                        SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            
                                         JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662                                                             
                        Kanno has filed a paper withdrawing from the interference proceeding.  Paper 15.  The                            
                paper is considered a request for entry of adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662.  Accordingly,                          
                it is                                                                                                                    







Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007