The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 16 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: 15 March 2001 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ HIROSHI KANNO Junior Party, (Patent 5,998,005), v. PAUL MARY FLYNN, RICHARD LEON McCONNELL, HUBERTUS JACOBUS WILHELMUS MOOLENAAR and TIMOTHY MICHAEL SANDERS Senior Party (Application 09/576,425). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,663 _______________ Before: SCHAFER, LEE and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Kanno has filed a paper withdrawing from the interference proceeding. Paper 15. The paper is considered a request for entry of adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662. Accordingly, it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007