The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 21 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed Washington, D.C. 20231 18 October 2001 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ MASAHARU WATANABE, NORIAKI TOCHIZAWA YUKARI IMAMURA and HIDEO KIKUCHI, Junior Party, (Patent 6,140,007), v. NAOHITO OGISO, TETSUYA WATANABE and TETSUYA YAMADA, Senior Party (Application 09/269,564). _______________ Patent Interference 104,719 (McK) _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge , and SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge . JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Upon consideration of the WATANABE REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT (Paper 18), it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior partyPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007