The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 9
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: August 3, 2001
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
KAZUHIDE HAYAMA, KANJI NARAZAKI, YUKIO SAITOH,
TOMOAKI HIWATASHIH, ISAO ITOH, SIGEOKI KAWAGUCHI
Junior Party,
(Patent 5,362,485)
v.
KANTA KUMAR, RAMESH C. KUMAR,
SMARAJIT MITRA
Senior Party
(Application 08/460,958).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,725
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGEMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a) and § 1.659(c))
A. Judgment
A conference call took place on July 31, 2001 between a representative of Oblon, Spivak,
McClelland, Maier & Neustadt and Ms. Sonja Despertt, an interference trial section paralegal.
During the conference call, the Oblon, Spivak representative informed Ms. Despertt that Junior
Party Hayama would not be contesting the interference. This abandonment of contest is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007