Interference No. 104,732 Page 2 As set forth in the Communications of August 27, 2001 (Paper No. 7) and September 14, 2001 (Paper No. 13), Junior Party Jao was to file, but not serve, a preliminary statement with the Board by September 26, 2001. Jao was informed that failure to file a preliminary statement with the Board by the September deadline would result in an entry of adverse judgment against Jao on the issue of priority. During the conference call of September 26, 2001, Junior Party Jao stated that no preliminary statement would be filed in this interference. Accordingly, we enter adverse judgment against Jao.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007