The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD BUCALA and JASON CHESNEY ___________ Appeal No. 2001-0403 Application No. 08/738,947 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge. Per curiam. On September 16, 1999, appellants filed a Notice of Appeal (Paper No. 18 ). On March 1, 2002, appellants filed a communication captioned “Request to Withdraw Appeal” and indicating that appellants “have elected to file a continuation application claiming priority from the above-captioned matter” (Paper No. 33). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal filed September 16, 2002 is dismissed.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007