Appeal No. 2000-0187
Application No. 08/430,943
the remote display driver is operative to cause
the remote video display to display a video image in
response to the digital data sent by the wireless
receiver.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:1
Folger et al. (Folger) 5,337,044 Aug. 09, 1994
Gaskill et al. (Gaskill) 5,440,559 Aug. 08, 1995
(filed Nov. 10, 1993)
Carleton et al. (Carleton) EP 0616448 Sep. 21, 1994
(Published European Patent Application)
Claims 1-21 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner offers Appellant’s
admitted prior art in view of Carleton with respect to claims
1-4, 9-12, 17, 20, and 21, adds Folger to the basic combination
with respect to claims 5, 6, 13, 14, 18, and 19, and adds Gaskill
to the basic combination with respect to claims 7, 8, 15, and 16.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs2 and Answer for the
respective details.
1 In addition, the Examiner relies on Appellant’s admissions as to the
prior art appearing in the “Background of the Invention” beginning at page 1,
line 7 of the specification.
2 The Appeal Brief was filed August 25, 1997 (Paper No. 11). In
response to the Examiner’s Answer dated November 25, 1997, (Paper No. 12), a
Reply Brief was filed December 15, 1997 (Paper No. 13), which was acknowledged
and entered by the Examiner in the communication dated December 13, 2001
(Paper No. 15).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007