Ex Parte OSAWA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0225                                                        
          Application 08/677,543                                                      

               Independent claim 19 is reproduced as follows:                         
               19.  A recording medium, comprising:                                   
               a first recording area for recording key storage                       
          information; and                                                            
               a second recording area for recording an enciphered signal             
          which has been obtained by processing an input signal by a number           
          of signal processing means to be recorded to said second                    
          recording area, each of the signal processing means enciphering             
          user data represented by said input signal and at least one of              
          the signal processing means enciphering said user data by using             
          encryption key information to generate said enciphered signal               
          representing said user data, said key storage information                   
          containing location information of said encryption key                      
          information being used by signal reproducing apparatus to                   
          decipher said enciphered signal, said location information                  
          specifying whether said encryption key information has been                 
          recorded to said recording medium or whether said encryption key            
          information has been stored to a storage other than said                    
          recording medium, said key storage information further containing           
          attribute information for specifying which of the signal                    
          processing means has enciphered said user data.                             
               The Examiner does not rely on any references.                          
               Claims 19 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as           
          being non-statutory subject matter.                                         
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the briefs1 and answer for the               
          respective details thereof.                                                 


               1 Appellants filed an appeal brief on March 9, 1999.  Appellants filed a
          reply brief on July 15, 1999.  The Examiner mailed an office communication on
          October 2, 2000 stating that the reply had been entered and considered.     
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007