The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte SERGIO PERATONER _____________ Appeal No. 2000-0259 Application 08/827,835 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 19-36, 38, and 39, which are the only claims remaining in the application. Claims 1-18 and 37 have been canceled. The claimed invention relates to a modularized distributed electronic price display system which includes a central computer communicating through a hard wired or radio frequency system to receivers located at each aisle of a retail store or warehouse.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007