Ex Parte AYERST et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0272                                                        
          Application No. 08/922,715                                                  

               Claim 13 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it              
          reads as follows:                                                           
               13.  In a selective call transceiver that receives                     
               stored messages from a base station on a forward channel and           
               transmits signals to the base station on a reverse channel,            
               a method of re-establishing communication with the base                
               station after temporarily losing the forward channel,                  
               comprising:                                                            
                    a) storing an indication of a re-registration interval;           
                    b) determining when the forward channel has been lost,            
                    irrespective of whether a message was being received              
                    from the base station;                                            
                    c) upon re-acquiring the same forward channel,                    
                    determining whether the forward channel was lost for a            
                    duration that exceeds the re-registration interval; and           
                    d) without changing channels, transmitting a re-                  
                    registration signal to the base station if the re-                
                    registration interval was exceeded.                               
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Fascenda et al. (Fascenda)    4,845,491           Jul.  4, 1989             
          Balachandran                  5,594,943           Jan. 14, 1997             
                                   (effective filing date Aug. 9, 1994)               
               Claims 1, 3 through 5 and 9 through 13 stand rejected under            
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the admitted prior               
          art, Balachandran and Fascenda.                                             





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007