Ex Parte EMMRICH et al - Page 8





               Appeal No. 2000-0345                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/419,219                                                                                           
               adhesives, and the like.”  Specification, page 9, lines 28-30.  The Kauth patent teaches                             
               that its insect control article may be hung in a closet, but does not provide any specific                           
               structures by which the insect control article may be hung.  We take Official Notice that                            
               the use of hanging means such as hooks, strings, adhesives and the like are well                                     
               known in the art of pest control.1  Thus, it would have been obvious to the ordinary                                 
               artisan to use hanging means such as hooks, strings, adhesives, etc., as set forth in the                            
               specification because the use of such structures to hang an article such as an insect                                
               control strip is well known and routine in the art, and Kauth specifically teaches that the                          
               insect control article may be hung in a closet.                                                                      
                       Claim 13 requires that the insect active control ingredient include transfluthrin or                         
               tefluthrin, and claim 14 requires that the insect active control ingredient include                                  
               transfluthrin.  As discussed above, Kauth teaches the use of pyrethroids such as                                     
               vaporthrin, but does not suggest the use of the pyrethroids transfluthrin or tefluthrin.  We                         
               note that the specification infers that the pyrethroids transfluthrin or tefluthrin are known                        
               insecticides, thus we take Official Notice of their known use as insecticides.2  It would                            
               have been obvious to the routineer to use a pyrethroid such as transfluthrin or tefluthrin                           

                                                                                                                                   
               1 If Appellants dispute that these structures are not well known in the art for use as means to hang a pest          
               control article, they are required to make their challenge of record in response to the above new grounds            
               of rejection.  If no such challenge is made of record in the response, the fact that is the subject of the           
               Official Notice will be deemed to be admitted as fact.                                                               
               2 Again, if Appellants wish to challenge the fact the pyrethroids transfluthrin or tefluthrin are known              
               insecticides, they must make that challenge of record in response to the above new grounds of rejection.             
               Otherwise, the fact will be deemed as admitted by Appellants.                                                        
                                                                 8                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007