Ex Parte DURHAM et al - Page 3




            Appeal No. 2000-0354                                                                       
            Application No. 08/682,471                                                                 


            1 of microprocessor and battery powered laptop computers and                               
            notebook computers.  Their discussion extends, in accordance with                          
            the paragraph bridging columns 2 and 3, to a self contained                                
            battery powered keyboard entry device using microprocessors where                          
            the system is designed to conserve power by automatically                                  
            powering down to the standby mode between keystrokes.  Most                                
            telling however, is the discussion in the middle of column                                 
            3 where it is recognized that portable computers have different                            
            levels of power control including the third level where the                                
            separately powered elements themselves each decide when to reduce                          
            power by going to a lower power operating mode.  This is                                   
            consistent with the disclosed and claimed invention.                                       
                  On the other hand, Webster’s title clearly indicates a power                         
            management control apparatus which has been collocated on the                              
            same integrated circuit chip as the functional unit that it                                
            manages.  This concept is shown in the initial embodiment in                               
            figures 1 through 4.  These showings as well are consistent with                           
            the disclosed and claimed invention.                                                       
                  As asserted by the examiner in the final rejection and                               
            answer, we agree with the examiner’s view that it would have been                          
            obvious to place the circuitry of the admitted prior art as well                           
            as the teachings of Bajorek on the same integrated circuit chip                            

                                                  3                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007