The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATYA P. ARYA
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0356
Application No. 08/825,424
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The examiner rejected claims 40-55. The appellant
appeals therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal is a suspension for
a transducer in a disk drive. A disk drive stores data on
and retrieves data from concentric tracks of a rotatable
magnetic disk. A transducer is moved from track-to-track to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007