Appeal No. 2000-0398
Application 08/903,406
apparently derivable from the teachings and showings in Bottelson’s
figures, and apply them to the teachings and showings of Morris’s
rating plug cover 21. We therefore reverse the rejection of this
claim and its respective dependent claims.
In summary, we have sustained the rejection of claims 1, 3 and
4, but have reversed the rejection of claims 2, 5-7, 9, 10 and 12
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Therefore, the decision of the examiner
rejecting various claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
James D. Thomas )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Kenneth W. Hairston ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Joseph F. Ruggiero )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JDT/cam
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007