Ex Parte CHANG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0421                                                        
          Application 08/912,429                                                      

          amendment after final rejection was filed on December 2, 1998 and           
          was entered by the examiner.                                                
               The disclosed invention pertains to a method of packaging a            
          flip chip and to the flip chip package which results therefrom.             
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A method of packaging a flip chip, comprising the                  
          following steps:                                                            
               coupling an integrated circuit (IC) chip to a first side of            
          a package substrate;                                                        
               placing at least one first electrical interconnection on a             
          second side of said package substrate which is coupled to said IC           
          chip; and,                                                                  
               positioning at least one second electrical interconnection             
          on said second side of said package substrate and underlying a              
          shadow region of said IC chip, wherein said at least one second             
          electrical interconnection reduces the shear and bending stress             
          on said at least one first electrical interconnection.                      
                                                                                     
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Pastore et al. (Pastore)      5,285,352          Feb. 08, 1994              
          Ho                            5,598,036          Jan. 28, 1997              
          Bond et al. (Bond)            5,642,261          June 24, 1997              
               Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35            
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of                   
          Pastore.  Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14 also stand rejected           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure             
          of Bond.  Claims 1-3, 5-7, 9-11 and 13-15 stand rejected under 35           
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Ho            
                                          -2-                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007