The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte
HAP NGUYEN
Appeal No. 2000-0426
Application No. 08/427,447
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, LALL, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 5, 6 and 7, which
constitutes all of the pending claims in the application.
The disclosed invention relates to an anti-carjacking device.
The apparatus involves a first part comprising a controller in
connection with the engine of said vehicle and in radio frequency
communication with an enabling device (concealed on a person) that
sends RF response signals in response to an interrogating signal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007