Ex Parte MANCISIDOR - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0430                                                        
          Application No. 08/742,104                                                  

               Claim 6 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    6.  A computer implemented method for synchronizing               
               threads in a computer system executing two or more operating           
               system personalities, said operating system personalities              
               having at least two different synchronization syntaxes, the            
               method comprising the steps of:                                        
                    intercepting each synchronization request from one of             
               said two or more operating system personalities;                       
                    transforming said intercepted request into a generic              
               synchronization format by applying a transformation in                 
               response to the synchronization syntax of said operating               
               system personality; and                                                
                    performing said synchronization operation.                        
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Miyahara                 5,504,814                Apr. 2, 1996              
          Open VMS RTL Parallel Processing (PPL$) Manual, pp. 1-2 and                 
          4-1 through 4-17 (Maynard, MA, Digital Equipment Corp., May                 
          1993)(hereinafter referred to as the Digital Equipment Manual).             
          Multithreaded Programming Guide, pp. 66-77 (Mountain View, CA,              
          SunSoft - Sun Microsystems, Inc.)(hereinafter referred to as the            
          SunSoft Guide).                                                             
               Claims 1 through 3, 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          §§ 102(a) and (e) as being anticipated by Miyahara.                         
               Claims 4, 7, 8, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Miyahara in view of the SunSoft            
          Guide.                                                                      

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007