The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GERHARD SEEMAN,
KLAUS BOSSLET, and
HANS H. SEDLACEK
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0461
Application No. 08/460,569
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-4, 6-9, 11 and 15, which are all the claims
pending in the application.
1 Pursuant to appellants request (Paper No. 51, received November 22, 1999) an oral hearing for
this appeal was scheduled for February 21, 2002. However, we note appellants waived (Paper
No. 55, received February 12, 2002) their request for oral hearing. Accordingly, we considered
this appeal on Brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007