The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CARSTEN BAUMANN, DIETER FEUSTEL
and NORBERT HUEBNER
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0478
Application No. 08/913,380
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRATZ, TIMM and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 11-15. Claims 16-24, which are all of other claims
pending in this application, have been indicated as allowable by
the examiner.
BACKGROUND
The subject matter of the appealed claims relates to water
soluble nonionic polyurethanes described as a reaction product of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007