Appeal No. 2000-0550
Application 08/706,114
recited in Appellant’s claims 1 and 4. Furthermore, we note that
claims 2 and 3 are dependent on claim 1 and thereby recite the
above limitation.
Therefore, we find that Basso fails to teach all of the
limitations of claims 1 through 4, and thereby the claims are not
anticipated by Basso.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 1 through 4 is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF:pgg
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007