Appeal No. 2000-0591 Application No. 08/311,291 proper for the PTO to require evidence that such an unprecedented feat has actually been accomplished” (Id., page 4). In our view, this is putting the cart before the horse. As stated in In re Marzocchi, 439 F.2d 220, 223, 169 USPQ 367, 369-70 (CCPA 1971): [A] specification disclosure which contains a teaching of the manner and process of making and using the invention in terms which correspond in scope to those used in describing and defining the subject matter sought to be patented must be taken as in compliance with the enabling requirement of the first paragraph of § 112 unless there is reason to doubt the objective truth of the statements contained therein which must be relied on for enabling support. In other words, “[w]hen rejecting a claim under the enablement requirement of section 112,” it is well settled that “the PTO bears an initial burden of setting forth a reasonable explanation as to why it believes that the scope of protection provided by that claim is not adequately enabled by the description of the invention provided in the specification of the application; this includes, of course, providing sufficient reasons for doubting any assertions in the specification as to the scope of enablement.” In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1561, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1513 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Thus, the threshold issue here is not whether appellants have established that their disclosure is broadly enabling for the scope of the claims, rather, the issue is whether the PTO has met its “initial burden of setting forth a reasonable explanation as to why” it is not. Keeping this in mind, we consider some of the specific issues raised by the examiner in support of his position. The examiner argues that “[a]ntiviral agents . . . operate by inhibiting one or more of the enzymes that are essential for the vital tasks of the virus, such as entering a cell, or replicating,” but “[viral] families are usually not organized on the basis of their 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007