Ex Parte LIETSALMI et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2000-0611                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/708,179                                                                                  

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     Appellants' invention relates to methods and apparatus for providing an                              
              interactive cell broadcast service which uses a point-to-multipoint transmission and a                      
              point-to-point  acknowledgment signal.  An understanding of the invention can be                            
              derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                     
                     1.     A method for operating a wireless communications system of a                                  
                     type that comprises a Base Station/Mobile Switching Center/ Interworking                             
                     function (BMI), comprising the steps of:                                                             
                            transmitting a point-to-multipoint message from the BMI to a                                  
                            plurality of mobile stations; and                                                             
                            in at least some of the plurality of mobile stations, receiving                               
                            the point-to-multipoint message and transmitting an                                           
                            acknowledgment message to the BMI using a point-to-point                                      
                            message.                                                                                      
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Siwiak et al. (Siwiak)              4,875,038                           Oct. 17, 1989                       
              Comroe et al. (Comroe)              5,179,721                           Jan. 12, 1993                       
              Neustein                            5,473,667                           Dec. 05, 1995                       
              Raith et al. (Raith)                5,603,081                           Feb. 11, 1997                       
                                                                              (Filed Nov. 01, 1993)                       
                     Claims 1 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                           
              over Comroe in view of Siwiak.  Claims 2-5 and 7-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                           
              § 103 as being unpatentable over Comroe and Siwiak in view of Neustein.  Claims 6                           
              and 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Comroe                            
              and Siwiak and  Neustein in view of Raith.                                                                  
                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007