Ex Parte BACHMANN et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 39              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                      Ex parte JURGEN BACHMANN, LARS L. FINSEN,                       
                                 and POUL E. HANSEN                                   
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-0650                                  
                               Application 08/599,668                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 13 through 23, which are the only claims                
          remaining in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to            
          35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                            
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to                  
          forming a wire which is used for forming the stator windings of             
          an electrical refrigeration compressor (Brief, page 2).  A                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007