Appeal No. 2000-0672
Application 08/838,027
Rejections at Issue
Claims 1-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102/103
allowed. Rather than repeat the arguments of the Appellants or
2
the Examiner, we make reference to the briefs1 and the answer
for the details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful review of the record before us, we do not
agree with the Examiner that claims 1 through 26 are properly
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or alternatively, under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. Thus, we will reverse the rejection of these claims for
the reasons set forth infra.
Appellants argue that Drebinger does not teach every element
of the claimed invention. Specifically, Appellants argue that
rather than storing signal delay associated with one or more
receiver stages of the corresponding positioning radio receivers,
1Appellants filed an appeal brief on June 11, 1999. We will
refer to this appeal brief as simply the Brief. Appellants filed
a Reply Brief on August 11, 1999. We will refer to this reply
brief as Reply Brief.
2
2The Examiner responded to the brief with an Examiner’s
answer dated June 24, 1999. We will refer to the Examiner’s
answer as simply the Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007