Ex Parte FEINSTEIN et al - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2000-0674                                                                                                   
               Application 08/867,511                                                                                                 

               the claimed invention as a whole, including each and every limitation of the claims, without                           
               recourse to the teachings in appellants’ disclosure.  See generally, In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350,                     
               1358, 47 USPQ2d 1453, 1458 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Pro-Mold and Tool Co. v. Great Lakes Plastics                             
               Inc., 75 F.3d 1568, 1573, 37 USPQ2d 1626, 1629-30 (Fed. Cir. 1996); In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071,                         
               1074-76, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598-1600 (Fed. Cir. 1988); In re Dow Chem. Co., 837 F.2d 469,                                 
               473, 5 USPQ2d 1529, 1531-32  (Fed. Cir. 1988).  The requirement for objective factual                                  
               underpinnings for a rejection under § 103(a) extends to the determination of whether the                               
               references can be combined.  See In re Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1343, 61 USPQ2d 1430, 1433-34                               
               (Fed. Cir. 2002), and cases cited therein.                                                                             
                       On this record, we must agree with appellants that the examiner has not made out a prima                       
               facie case of obviousness with respect to the claimed invention.  The examiner submits that one                        
               of ordinary skill in this art would have combined LaPierre with Reichmann and found therein the                        
               motivation to include in the process of LaPierre “a hydrogenation catalyst prior to the                                
               isomerization catalyst because Reichmann has taught that use of a hydrogenation catalyst in a                          
               continuous xylene isomerization process reduces xylene loss” (answer, page 4).  For the reasons                        
               given by appellants in the brief and reply brief and the following, we cannot agree.                                   
                       As pointed out by appellants, the catalyst system used by LaPierre makes use of two                            
               different zeolite catalysts, each of which must contain “an amount of a noble metal effective to                       
               increase the hydrogenative activity of the zeolite” (page 3, 21-27; see also page 4, lines 37-43).                     
               Indeed, LaPierre is interested in addressing the problem presented by ethylbenzene as well as                          
               paraffins in the loop manufacture of xylene (e.g., page 2, lines 40-57).  We note that there is no                     
               mention by LaPierre of a problem with olefins in the process stream.                                                   
                       As further pointed out by appellants, the two catalyst system of Reichmann uses a                              
               hydrogenation catalyst to contend with the problem created by the formation of olefins by the                          
               isomerization catalyst in the loop manufacture of xylenes, and in this respect teaches that the                        
               position of the hydrogenation catalyst in the loop is after the isomerization catalyst even though                     
               the process is illustrated with the hydrogenation catalyst in front of the isomerization catalyst in                   
               order to treat the olefins present in the recycle stream for the isomerization catalyst (cols. 3-4).                   
                                                                                                                                      
               2  Answer, pages 3-4.                                                                                                  

                                                                - 2 -                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007