Appeal No. 2000-0703
Application No. 08/490,268
In conclusion, we have not sustained the rejection of claims
1 through 6, 8, 10, 13 through 20 and 24 through 26 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for either lack of written
description or lack of enablement; nor have we sustained the
rejection of these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being
anticipated by the admitted prior art.
Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1
through 6, 8, 10, 13 through 20 and 24 through 26 is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007