Appeal No. 2000-0723
Application 08/852,415
Yoshio et al. (Yoshio) 5,446,714 Aug. 29, 1995
Lee et al. (Lee) 5,561,649 Oct. 01, 1996
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1-3 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Hatakenaka and
Yamauchi.
2. Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Hatakenaka, Yamauchi
and Yoshio.
3. Claims 8-14, 16-24, 26 and 27 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Allen and Lee.
4. Claims 15 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Allen, Lee,
Duffield and Shinbo.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007