Ex parte OHSHITA - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication        
                                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                                                                             Paper No. 15                     
                                                                                                             
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               _____________                                                  
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               _____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte HIROMI OHSHITA                                              
                                               _____________                                                  
                                            Appeal No. 2000-0744                                              
                                         Application No. 09/052,162                                           
                                              ______________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                             _______________                                                  
            Before THOMAS, KRASS,  and GROSS,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 2.                   
                   The invention is directed to a resolver used in a motor.  In particular, the resolver is   
            alleged to have an improved simplified structure.  The resolver comprises a ring-shaped           
            rotor of magnetic material wherein the rotor does not have a winding.  The                        
            outer periphery of a ring-shaped stator is directly exposed to the outside or abuts the           
            inner periphery of a motor case.  The inner periphery of the rotor is also directly exposed to    


                                                      1                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007