Ex Parte HUANG et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 42         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                         Ex parte SUN-YI HUANG, LOUIS ROSATI,                         
                               and JOSEPH J. KOZAKIEWICZ                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0836                                 
                              Application No. 08/727,693                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before CAROFF, GARRIS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1-44, all the claims in appellants’                     
          application.                                                                
               The claims on appeal relate to methods of using an aqueous             
          dispersion of particular polymers, or “aqueous admixture thereof”.          
               Appellants acknowledge on page 5 of their brief that all of            
          the appealed claims stand or fall together.  Accordingly, we need           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007