Appeal No. 2000-1032
Application No. 08/795,878
this argument is highlighted by the fact that it has not been
rebutted by the examiner in his answer.
In light of the forgoing, we are constrained to agree
with the appellant that the examiner, in making and
maintaining the Section 103 rejection before us, “ignores the
full teaching of the references and only picks and chooses the
necessary parts from the [references applied in the] rejection
to piecemeal
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007