Ex Parte CERF et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and             
                                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                                          Paper No. 35               
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                        Ex parte MARTINE CERF, OLIVIER DENIZART                                                      
                                                    and CHRISTIAN DOUSSON                                                            
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                        Appeal No. 2000-1131                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/505,183                                                      
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                      HEARD: March 21, 2002                                                          
                                                            ____________                                                             
               Before OWENS, TIMM, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of                     
               claims 1 and 3-8, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                            
                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                  
                       Appellants’ invention relates to a multilayered article and processes for producing it.                       
               Claims 1 and 7 are illustrative:                                                                                      
                       1.  A multilayered article comprising a layer of vulcanized elastomer overmoulded                             
               directly on a thermoplastic layer, wherein the thermoplastic layer is polybutylene terephthalate, a                   
               polyvinylidene fluoride containing mixture, an ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer, or an                                
               ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene copolymer, the elastomer being an epichlorohydrin elastomer or an                        
               elastomer functionalized with carboxylic, epoxy or amino groups.                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007