The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte STEPHEN R. GENHEIMER, KENNETH L. POTTEBAUM, JON P. BAKER and JOHN D. STRICKLIN ______________ Appeal No. 2000-1232 Application 09/114,954 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 18-24. Of these claims, the examiner has indicated the allowability of claims 18-23 at pages 2 and 5 of the answer. Therefore, only claim 24 remains for our consideration on appeal. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007