Ex parte HOBSON et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2000-1252                                                            
          Application No. 08/522,839                                                      


                     adding the correction estimate to the servo position                 
                          error signal to provide an adjusted servo                       
                          position error signal; and                                      
                     using the adjusted servo position error signal to                    
                          correct the position of the actuator.                           
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                                
          Andrews, Jr. et al. (Andrews)        5,539,714       Jul. 23,                   
          1996                                                                            
                                     (effective filing date Sep. 25, 1991)                
               Claims 1 through 8 and 11 through 13 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Andrews.                             
               Reference is made to the brief (paper number 22) and the                   
          answer (paper number 24) for the respective positions of the                    
          appellants and the examiner.                                                    
                                         OPINION                                          
               We have carefully considered the entire record before us,                  
          and we will reverse the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claims                  
          1 through 8 and 11 through 13.                                                  
               Appellants argue (brief, pages 12 through 23) that none                    
          of the claimed steps and apparatus for reducing RRO signals in                  
          the SPE signal is disclosed in Andrews, whereas the examiner                    
          contends (answer, pages 4 through 8) that all of the claimed                    
          steps and apparatus are met by the teachings of Andrews.                        

                                            4                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007