Appeal No. 2000-1289 Page 9
Application No. 08/604,829
information in the memory bank 70 at its own speed.” Id. at
ll. 8-13.
Relying on Farr merely to “teach[] a disk storage system
which operates in a RAID level 5 mode,” (Examiner’s Answer at
6), the examiner fails to allege, let alone show, that the
secondary reference cures the defect of the primary
references. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of
independent claim 11 and of claims 6, 7, 9, and 10, which
depend therefrom.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 6, 7, and 9-11 under
§ 103(a) is revered.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007