Ex Parte IKEDA et al - Page 1





                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for       
                                  publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
            Paper No. 35                                                                                      
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                Ex parte NAOTO IKEDA and KENJI ENOMOTO                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2000-1320                                             
                                           Application No. 08/796,737                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before KRASS, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
            DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 5-8, 11,        
            and 16.  Claims 9, 10 and 12-15 are withdrawn from consideration as directed to non-              
            elected inventions.                                                                               


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007