The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM J. DRASLER, ROBERT G. DUTCHER, MARK L. JENSON,
JOSEPH M. THIELEN and EMMANUIL I. PROTONOTARIOS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1359
Application No. 08/351,613
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 79-86,
90, 91, 102, 105 and 106, as amended after the final rejection. Claims 87-89, 92-101,
103, 104 and 107-110 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter. The
remaining claims have been canceled.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007