Ex Parte KORNFLAT et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and          
                                                  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                                                        Paper No. 23              
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                        Ex parte SVEN KORNFLAT, PER BENGTSSON,                                                    
                                                        and HANS SJOLIN                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                      Appeal No. 2000-1383                                                        
                                                    Application No. 08/817,391                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                    HEARD: March 21, 2002                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                            
               Before OWENS, TIMM, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                      Applicants’ appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 3, 4, and                  
               6-14, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35                      
               U.S.C. § 134.                                                                                                      













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007