Appeal No. 2000-1425 Application No. 07/921,508 containing a selected electrical component corresponding to said selected auditory component in said environmental sound; an adaptive filter receiving said electrical input signal and providing a filtered signal, said adaptive filter having adaptable filtering characteristics based upon a reference and being operable in response to activation to adapt said filtering characteristics using said electrical input signal as said reference to determine said filtering characteristics required to filter said selected electrical component from said electrical input signal, said adaptive filter continuing to provide said filtered signal while adapting said filtering characteristics in response to said activation; a receiver receiving said filtered signal and converting said filtered signal to said auditory stimulus; and user-controlled activation means for activating said adaptive filter at a time controlled by said user, whereby said user can initiate adaptation of said filter without changing operating characteristics of said filter other than as a result of said adaptation. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Graupe et al. (Graupe) 4,783,818 Nov. 08, 1988 Harris et al. (Harris) 4,791,390 Dec. 13, 1988 Goodings et al. (Goodings) 5,259,033 Nov. 02, 1993 Widrow and Stearns, Adaptive Signal Processing, 1985, pp. 103-106 and 350 (Widrow) Claims 1, 4, 6, 12, 14, 15, and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Graupe in view of Goodings. Claims 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Graupe in view of Goodings and Harris. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007