Ex Parte LONG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1449                                                        
          Application No. 08/838,133                                                  


               Appellant’s invention pertains to threaded tamper-evident              
          container closures, and to threaded tamper-evident closures having          
          push-pull resealable tamper-evident pour spouts.                            
               The references cited in the final rejection are:                       
          Thomas et al. (Thomas)        2,998,902      Sep.  5, 1961                  
          Arona-Delonghi                4,919,309      Apr. 24, 1990                  
          Beck                          5,456,374      Oct. 10, 1995                  
          Sander et al. (Sander)        5,588,562      Dec. 31, 1996                  
               Claims 42 and 43 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second          
          paragraph.                                                                  
               Claims 1-14, 37-39 and 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Sander in view of Arona-Delonghi.          
               Claims 16-28 and 43 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Sander in view of Arona-Delonghi, and               
          further in view of Thomas.                                                  
               Claims 31, 32, 34-36 and 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Sander in view of Arona-Delonghi           
          and Thomas, and further in view of Beck ‘374.                               
               Reference is made to appellant’s main and reply briefs (Paper          
          Nos. 11 and 16) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 13) for the         
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner regarding the            
          merits of these rejections.                                                 



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007