Ex Parte NAIDU et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2000-1519                                                        
          Application No. 08/674,875                                                  

          prior to the transmission link was well known.                              
               However, we find nothing in Lemson, and the examiner has not           
          convincingly pointed to anything in Lemson that would suggest               
          employing a signal level comparator for generating a single gain            
          control signal and a gain controller for adjusting the gain based           
          on the single gain control signal, both in each one of a                    
          plurality of remote antenna units, as claimed.                              
               While column 40, lines 22-29, of Lemson suggests the use of            
          a single gain control signal prior to the transmission link in              
          the prior art to Lemson, Lemson is comparing that to his                    
          invention.  There is no indication therein that the prior art,              
          being described by Lemson, also had the signal level comparator             
          and a gain controller for adjusting the gain based on the single            
          gain control signal both in each one of a plurality of remote               
          antenna units, as claimed.                                                  
               While Figure 2 of Lemson, with its attendant description,              
          clearly does show a signal level comparator for comparing a                 
          received signal level with a predetermined reference level and it           
          does show a gain controller (attenuators 32 and 34), the                    
          comparator within the controller 42 generates more than a single            
          gain control signal (one signal each to the attenuators) and                
          there is no indication of an embodiment wherein only a single               
                                         -6–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007