Appeal No. 2000-1531
Application No. 08/897,405
examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness
with regard to this claimed subject matter.
Since Hargrove does not provide for the deficiencies of
Bloomberg and Endo, and we have not sustained the rejection of
independent claims 1, 10, 15 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. 103, we
also will not sustain the rejection of dependent claims 2-9,
11-14, 16-23 and 25-28 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
9–
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007